So you want to answer the phone call for Papers? It provides suggestions for this content and presentation for the abstract, in addition to samples of the best abstracts submitted into the 2012-2013 selection that is abstract for the ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.
Typically, an abstract describes this issue you would like to present in the conference, highlighting your argument, evidence and contribution into the literature that is historical. It is almost always limited to 250-500 words. The word limit online essay from could be challenging: some graduate students do not fret over the short limit and hastily write and submit an abstract in the eleventh hour, which regularly hurts their likelihood of being accepted; other students try to condense the Next Great American Novel into 250 words, which can be equally damning. Graduate students who approach the abstract early, plan accordingly, and carefully edit are the ones most frequently invited to present their research. If you are intimidated because of the project, don’t be – the abstract is a form that is fairly standardized of. Follow the basic guidelines below and avoid common pitfalls and you may greatly boost your abstract.
Diligently follow all style that is abstract formatting guidelines. Most CFPs will specify page or word length, and perhaps some layout or style guidelines. Some CFPs, however, will list very specific restrictions, including font, font size, spacing, text justification, margins, just how to present quotes, how exactly to present authors and works, whether to include footnotes or otherwise not. Make certain you strictly abide by all guidelines, including submission instructions. If a CFP does not provide abstract style and formatting guidelines, it is generally appropriate to stay around 250 words – abstract committees read many of these things and do not look fondly on comparatively long abstracts. Make certain you orient your topic that is abstract to any specific CFP themes, time periods, methods, and/or buzzwords.
With a 250-500 word limit, write only what exactly is necessary, avoiding wordiness. Use active voice and look closely at excessive prepositional phrasing.
Plan your abstract carefully before writing it. A good abstract will address the following questions: what’s the historical question or problem? Contextualize your topic. What exactly is your thesis/argument? It should be original. What exactly is your evidence? State forthrightly that you will be using source material that is primary. How can your paper squeeze into the historiography? What’s happening in the field of study and how does your paper donate to it? How does it matter? We all know the subject is very important for you, why should it be important to the abstract selection committee?
You ought to be as specific as you can, avoiding overly broad or overreaching statements and claims. And that is it: don’t get sidetracked by writing narrative that is too much over explaining. Say what you should say and nothing more.
Maintain your audience in mind. How much background you give on a topic depends on the conference. Is the conference a broad humanities conference, a general graduate student history conference, or something more specific like a 1960s social revolutions conference? Your pitch ought to be suitable for the specificity associated with conference: the more specific the topic, the less broad background you need to give and vice versa.
Revise and edit your abstract to ensure that its final presentation is error free. The editing phase is also the time that is best to visit your abstract as a whole and chip away at unnecessary words or phrases. The draft that is final be linear and clear also it should read smoothly. If you should be tripping over something while reading, the selection that is abstract will as well. Ask another graduate student to see your abstract to ensure its clarity or attend a Graduate Student Writing Group meeting.
Your language must certanly be professional and your style should stay glued to standards that are academic. Contractions might be appealing due to the word limits, nevertheless they should always be avoided. If citation guidelines are not specifically given, it is appropriate to utilize the author’s name and title of work (in either italics or quotation marks) within the text rather than use footnotes or in-text citations.
While one question, if really good, can be posed in your abstract, you need to avoid writing more than one (maybe two, if really really good). That you either answer it or address why the question matters to your conference paper – unless you are posing an obvious rhetorical question, you should never just let a question hang there if you do pose a question or two, make sure. A lot of questions uses up way too much space and leaves less room if you are going to address one or all in your paper and if you even know the answers to them for you to develop your argument, methods, evidence, historiography, etc. Often times, posing too many questions leaves the abstract committee wondering. Remember, you aren’t expected to have already written your conference paper, however you are required to own done enough research that you are quite ready to write on a certain topic as you are able to adequately cover in 15-20 minutes. Prove that you have inked so.
Language that will help you be as specific as you possibly can in presenting your argument is fantastic but don’t ensure you get your readers bogged down in jargon. They will be reading plenty of abstracts and won’t would you like to wade through the language that is unnecessary. Ensure that it stays simple.
When students repeat claims, they often don’t realize they truly are doing this. Sometimes this occurs because students are not yet clear on their argument. Contemplate it even more and then write. Other times, students write carelessly and don’t proofread. Make sure each sentence is unique and therefore it contributes to the flow of your abstract.
The committee that is abstract not want to be reminded associated with grand sweep of history so that you can contextualize your topic. Place your topic specifically inside the historiography.
The samples below represent the five highest scoring samples submitted into the selection committee for the ninth annual graduate student history conference, 2012-2013. Two associated with samples below were subsequently selected for publication within the NC State Graduate Journal of History. Outstanding papers presented in the graduate student history conference are suitable for publication by panel commentators. Papers go through a peer review process before publication.